-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 86
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add use_github_action #132
Comments
I agree this sounds like a very good idea that we should implement. @annakrystalli would you like to make a PR with an |
I could definitely give it a go! It might be a couple of weeks till I can get to it though. |
Excellent! There is some interesting code in #109 that could serve as an inspiration. I think Github and Gitlab use a similar setup for their CI tools? |
I think this is the way to go. Use of travis and circle is now very uncommon in the R community, with most people adopting GitHub Actions for CI. I've been using GitHub Actions on my research compendia for a while and it's been fine. I propose to remove the functions for using travis and circle from rrtools, and add a function for GitHub Actions. What do you all reckon? |
I have to say that I really rarely used Travis/ circle ci functions for my
compendia, probably due to lack of proper knowledge how to use them.
If you guys think that github actions have a lower barrier of adoption a
will gladly give it a go!
Dr. med. Wojciech Francuzik <http://fracoscientific.com/>
Assistenzarzt
Allergologie und Immunologie
Klinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie
Campus Charite Mitte, Universitätsmedizin Berlin
Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin
Tel +49 (30) 450 618 344
śr., 3 sie 2022 o 00:18 Ben Marwick ***@***.***> napisał(a):
… I think this is the way to go. Use of travis and circle is now very
uncommon in the R community, with most people adopting GitHub Actions for
CI. I've been using GitHub Actions on my research compendia for a while and
it's been fine. I propose to remove the functions for using travis and
circle from rrtools, and add a function for GitHub Actions. What do you all
reckon?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#132 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAR7HR4C64ALPCRPY7XARI3VXGNCRANCNFSM4OOT4ZMA>
.
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message
ID: ***@***.***>
|
Please wait for some discussion of your request before making a Pull Request.
Is your feature request related to a problem? Please describe.
Many are using GitHub Actions for CI. For researchers, the ability to test on many systems with a single CI framework and script could lower the barrier to understanding their codes behaviour on different systems.
Describe the solution you'd like
Create a new
use_github_action
function based onusethis::use_github_action
(I believe still only available in devel) (perhaps with a more limited build matrix by default) and translate the Travis build workflow.** Describe alternatives you've considered**
A clear and concise description of any alternative solutions or features you've considered.
Additional context
Add any other context or screenshots about the feature request here.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: