Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[BUG]: admin only box when installing an app, parameter is not taken into account #265

Open
neosdot opened this issue Jun 20, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
bug Something isn't working

Comments

@neosdot
Copy link

neosdot commented Jun 20, 2024

What happened?

hi, when you check the admin only box when installing an app, the parameter is not taken into account, you must set it manually after deployment

What should have happened?

that the option is taken into account

How to reproduce the bug?

I tried with Dozzle and Firefox

Relevant log output

No response

Other details

I don't think it's worth opening a new issue for this info, so I'm sending it here at the same time, if necessary I can open another:
this warn message is spam every 30s in the logs (virtualized use case): [WARN] GetRecursiveDiskUsageAndSMARTInfo - Error fetching SMART info for /dev/sda: os not supported

System details

  • OS: ubuntu 22.04
  • Browser [e.g. chrome, safari] : firefox
  • Version [e.g. 22] : 0.15.7
@neosdot neosdot added the bug Something isn't working label Jun 20, 2024
@rpschube
Copy link
Contributor

Do you mean when creating a new URL or installing a ServApp? When installing a ServApp I don't believe that option is there. When creating a URL there is the 'Authentication Required' checkbox but 'Admin Only' isn't available on the form until after the URL is created.

@azukaar
Copy link
Owner

azukaar commented Aug 20, 2024

Which app is it specifically?
This option exist as some apps add it to the compose file itself, but it might have one broken compose

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants