You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
1) I think Talos should add a method for skip impossible combinations of parameters
If for example, I want to test a CNN with MLP networks, some parameters, such as the kernel_size does not exists in certain combinations. Moreover, if I limit the time or the number of combinations I do not want to waste some impossible combinations.
2) Once implemented, I can see how this feature will
Although there are methods for skip this manually, I think it should be nice to use parameter space in the same way that ParametersGrid from scikit-learn does.
You can achieve it with Scan( ... boolean_limit ... ) or a more custom way where the input model has something that tells Talos
Also, you can within the input model itself handle any logics you like. Talos will compute everything that is in the input model, regardless if it relates with tf/keras or not. This gives you unrestricted power to add any logic to the input model.
I do appreciate that there is a benefit in following a pattern by a library that benefits many in the Talos community. Thank you for suggesting it 👍
Hi. Thanks for your answer. First, I have to thank you for this tool. It is very useful to me.
Before I post my suggestion, I considered the following approaches:
Skip it inside the model, but I tried to return None, None but I think Talos expect both History and Model as output after each iteration. Moreover, I think that if you want to limit the permutations, this approach is not useful because if you set round_limit, Talos will not try as many combinations as it could.
Specify, beforehand, the valid combinations. In this case, I remember that scikit allows list of dictionaries as inputs, but I have no idea how complex it this to implement with Talos.
1) I think Talos should add a method for skip impossible combinations of parameters
If for example, I want to test a CNN with MLP networks, some parameters, such as the kernel_size does not exists in certain combinations. Moreover, if I limit the time or the number of combinations I do not want to waste some impossible combinations.
2) Once implemented, I can see how this feature will
Although there are methods for skip this manually, I think it should be nice to use parameter space in the same way that ParametersGrid from scikit-learn does.
For example:
3) I believe this feature is
4) Given the chance, I'd be happy to make a PR for this feature
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: