You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thank you very much for this nice package! I am trying to use your batch OT version of flow matching to perform the matching between two distributions, but I wonder how the OT mapping should work for conditional distributions.
Suppose I have a function y(x|c) and I want to transport it to z(x|c). When I sample n_events from these distributions, they will have different c values among themselves. How can one perform OT mapping between "events" with different condition values?
I thought of something like this: we split the data into bins of c [0, 0.1, 0.2, ...] where we don't expect the PDFs to change much, and during training, sample only events of y(x|c) and z(x|c) where the events of both are in the same bin.
Does that sound reasonable to you? Or is there a clever and simpler way to do it?
Best,
Caio
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Why do you say "best I can think of to do with relatively small data"? I actually have around 12 million events of both y(x|c) and z(x|c). Do you think there is a better solution for "big data"?
I still haven't had time to try it, but I will do so in the next few days and let you know if it worked.
Dear experts,
Thank you very much for this nice package! I am trying to use your batch OT version of flow matching to perform the matching between two distributions, but I wonder how the OT mapping should work for conditional distributions.
Suppose I have a function y(x|c) and I want to transport it to z(x|c). When I sample n_events from these distributions, they will have different c values among themselves. How can one perform OT mapping between "events" with different condition values?
I thought of something like this: we split the data into bins of c [0, 0.1, 0.2, ...] where we don't expect the PDFs to change much, and during training, sample only events of y(x|c) and z(x|c) where the events of both are in the same bin.
Does that sound reasonable to you? Or is there a clever and simpler way to do it?
Best,
Caio
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: