We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Given INFTExtension interface is empty, the ERC165 check for that is always true.
INFTExtension
https://github.com/buildship-dev/nft-contracts/blob/2f33f71c05266b45b1f1e3fb80e421087dd8f5b7/contracts/factory/extensions/INFTExtension.sol#L6-L7
Which means addExtension check doesn't check anything: https://github.com/buildship-dev/nft-contracts/blob/2f33f71c05266b45b1f1e3fb80e421087dd8f5b7/contracts/factory/MetaverseNFT.sol#L201-L205
addExtension
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Possible solutions are:
name
type
Sorry, something went wrong.
Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.
Given
INFTExtension
interface is empty, the ERC165 check for that is always true.https://github.com/buildship-dev/nft-contracts/blob/2f33f71c05266b45b1f1e3fb80e421087dd8f5b7/contracts/factory/extensions/INFTExtension.sol#L6-L7
Which means
addExtension
check doesn't check anything:https://github.com/buildship-dev/nft-contracts/blob/2f33f71c05266b45b1f1e3fb80e421087dd8f5b7/contracts/factory/MetaverseNFT.sol#L201-L205
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: