-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
unknown delivery tag issue #155
Comments
DavidWittman
pushed a commit
to DavidWittman/foo-foo-mq
that referenced
this issue
Jul 20, 2020
Send channel failures up to the connection so that they can be handled appropriately. Previously, errors on channels caused silent failures which could result in queues being unable to receive messages without any indication of failure, such as described in arobson#155. This approach is a bit naive in that it causes the whole connection to fail when an a single channel fails, but I don't think the abstractions in this library allow for the user to respond to channel-level events. In my case, this type of failure occurred any time my consumers lost their connection to the RabbitMQ cluster and tried to send an ack for an old delivery tag to a different RMQ node in the cluster (i.e. queue is re-established on new node and batch acks send after reconnecting). This would result in the following error in amqplib: Error: Channel closed by server: 406 (PRECONDITION-FAILED) with message "PRECONDITION_FAILED - unknown delivery tag 42" But from the perspective of foo-foo-mq/rabbot, everything was fine. With these changes in place, I can at least listen for a `failed` event on the broker and respond appropriately.
DavidWittman
pushed a commit
to DavidWittman/foo-foo-mq
that referenced
this issue
Nov 26, 2023
Send channel failures up to the connection so that they can be handled appropriately. Previously, errors on channels caused silent failures which could result in queues being unable to receive messages without any indication of failure, such as described in arobson#155. This approach is a bit naive in that it causes the whole connection to fail when an a single channel fails, but I don't think the abstractions in this library allow for the user to respond to channel-level events. In my case, this type of failure occurred any time my consumers lost their connection to the RabbitMQ cluster and tried to send an ack for an old delivery tag to a different RMQ node in the cluster (i.e. queue is re-established on new node and batch acks send after reconnecting). This would result in the following error in amqplib: Error: Channel closed by server: 406 (PRECONDITION-FAILED) with message "PRECONDITION_FAILED - unknown delivery tag 42" But from the perspective of foo-foo-mq/rabbot, everything was fine. With these changes in place, I can at least listen for a `failed` event on the broker and respond appropriately.
zlintz
pushed a commit
to Foo-Foo-MQ/foo-foo-mq
that referenced
this issue
Jan 25, 2024
Send channel failures up to the connection so that they can be handled appropriately. Previously, errors on channels caused silent failures which could result in queues being unable to receive messages without any indication of failure, such as described in arobson#155. This approach is a bit naive in that it causes the whole connection to fail when an a single channel fails, but I don't think the abstractions in this library allow for the user to respond to channel-level events. In my case, this type of failure occurred any time my consumers lost their connection to the RabbitMQ cluster and tried to send an ack for an old delivery tag to a different RMQ node in the cluster (i.e. queue is re-established on new node and batch acks send after reconnecting). This would result in the following error in amqplib: Error: Channel closed by server: 406 (PRECONDITION-FAILED) with message "PRECONDITION_FAILED - unknown delivery tag 42" But from the perspective of foo-foo-mq/rabbot, everything was fine. With these changes in place, I can at least listen for a `failed` event on the broker and respond appropriately. Co-authored-by: David Wittman <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I've consumer in cluster mode which acks after performing the task. but after certain number of messages it stops receiving the messages and when i check the rabbit mq log. i see following error message.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: