Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature]: Support Supabase S3 Datasource #34728

Open
1 task done
ame-appsmith opened this issue Jul 4, 2024 · 2 comments
Open
1 task done

[Feature]: Support Supabase S3 Datasource #34728

ame-appsmith opened this issue Jul 4, 2024 · 2 comments
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request Integrations Pod Issues related to a specific integration S3 Issues related to the S3 plugin

Comments

@ame-appsmith
Copy link

Is there an existing issue for this?

  • I have searched the existing issues

Summary

Supabase has recently made its storage S3 compatible as per this article from April, 18th, 2024.
At this juncture, it is not possible to connect to Supabase's S3 storage because the error SignatureDoesNotMatch: The request signature we calculate does not match the signature. gets returned when testing the configuration in Appsmith's S3 plugin.
We need to figure out the underlying issue and provide a fix to make our S3 plugin compatible with Supabase S3's storage.

More info in this Slack thread.

Why should this be worked on?

Allowing users to connect to Supabase's S3 storage would enhance the user experience since Supabase is very popular and more users will start using this.

@ame-appsmith ame-appsmith added Enhancement New feature or request S3 Issues related to the S3 plugin labels Jul 4, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the Integrations Pod Issues related to a specific integration label Jul 4, 2024
@AnnaHariprasad5123
Copy link
Contributor

AnnaHariprasad5123 commented Jul 8, 2024

Hi @ame-appsmith, @Nikhil-Nandagopal, I am willing to work on this. I have just created a Supabase account and a new project, and I have set up the access key and secret key.

We need to provide Supabase as an S3 service in the S3 plugin, right?
image

@Nikhil-Nandagopal
Copy link
Contributor

@AnnaHariprasad5123 yes that is correct

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement New feature or request Integrations Pod Issues related to a specific integration S3 Issues related to the S3 plugin
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants