You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I understand that AWX Operator is open source software provided for free and that I might not receive a timely response.
Feature Summary
I would like to propose an enhancement to the awx-operator to enable configuring container groups directly within the AWX Custom Resource Definition (CRD) specification. This feature would allow AWX instances to be deployed with predefined container groups, facilitating out-of-the-box execution of jobs across multiple Kubernetes clusters.
Why This Feature Matters
Implementing this capability would offer significant benefits, especially for disaster recovery strategies:
Seamless Recovery: With an external database and job execution occurring in other Kubernetes clusters via container groups, disaster recovery becomes as straightforward as redeploying the AWX object in a different cluster.
Scalability: It simplifies the scaling of AWX instances in multi-cluster environments.
Additional Context
This feature aligns with Kubernetes' declarative configuration model and promotes infrastructure-as-code practices.
It streamlines the deployment process in environments that utilize multiple Kubernetes clusters for job execution.
Below is an example of how the CRD spec might include container group configurations.
Please confirm the following
Feature Summary
I would like to propose an enhancement to the awx-operator to enable configuring container groups directly within the AWX Custom Resource Definition (CRD) specification. This feature would allow AWX instances to be deployed with predefined container groups, facilitating out-of-the-box execution of jobs across multiple Kubernetes clusters.
Why This Feature Matters
Implementing this capability would offer significant benefits, especially for disaster recovery strategies:
Additional Context
Example CRD Specification
Team, does this make sense to you? If so, we can discuss implementation details, I would be willing to work on this with you. Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: