You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Your work is really excellent and I am having some issues with your code. Can you provide me with some guidance? Thank you very much!
If I want to train at a lower resolution (like 256x256), which arguments should I change, is it just changing '__C.DATASET.CROP_SIZE = (448, 448)' to '__C.DATASET.CROP_SIZE = (256, 256)'? Also, should the settings of the normal loss function be changed with the resolution? (e.g., should the sampling distance or number of sampled points also be appropriately lowered? If so, can you give me some advice?Many Thanks!!)
You use an auxiliary training network to output disparity, can you tell me if the auxiliary structure significantly improves performance, or it only provides slight improvement? Is the auxiliary structure necessary for high-quality depth prediction? I'm trying to replace your main model structure with monodepth2's ResNet18 based network that outputs disparity, so I can't use a redundant auxiliary disparity prediction network for training, and I'm concerned that discarding the auxiliary structure will significantly impact performance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Your work is really excellent and I am having some issues with your code. Can you provide me with some guidance? Thank you very much!
If I want to train at a lower resolution (like 256x256), which arguments should I change, is it just changing '
__C.DATASET.CROP_SIZE = (448, 448)
' to '__C.DATASET.CROP_SIZE = (256, 256)
'? Also, should the settings of the normal loss function be changed with the resolution? (e.g., should the sampling distance or number of sampled points also be appropriately lowered? If so, can you give me some advice?Many Thanks!!)You use an auxiliary training network to output disparity, can you tell me if the auxiliary structure significantly improves performance, or it only provides slight improvement? Is the auxiliary structure necessary for high-quality depth prediction? I'm trying to replace your main model structure with monodepth2's ResNet18 based network that outputs disparity, so I can't use a redundant auxiliary disparity prediction network for training, and I'm concerned that discarding the auxiliary structure will significantly impact performance.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: