Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Risk Score Card Develope #514

Open
cfkstat opened this issue Jun 17, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Risk Score Card Develope #514

cfkstat opened this issue Jun 17, 2023 · 3 comments
Assignees
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@cfkstat
Copy link

cfkstat commented Jun 17, 2023

Maximize the AUC Score of the model training set and validation set, while ensuring that the difference between the two AUCs is less than 0.02, or the difference between KS indicators is less than 3%. It should be noted that the training set and validation set are split across time, such as the loan month.

@Mamba413
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks for this comment. But I do not fully understand this, does you mean splitting samples across time like sklearn.model_selection.TimeSeriesSplit?

@cfkstat
Copy link
Author

cfkstat commented Jun 19, 2023

It's similar, but not exactly the same. For example, to develop loan application score, I use loan credit 202204 to 202208 as the training set, and 202209 to 202210 as the valid set. It is necessary to optimize the AUC of the training set and the valid set, and it cannot be overfitted. The gap between the training and valid AUC is less than or equal to 2%, and the gap between KS is less than or equal to 3%.

@Mamba413
Copy link
Collaborator

Based on my understanding, the difference from sklearn.model_selection.TimeSeriesSplit is that you want to control the AUC of the validation set and training set within a certain range (e.g., 2%), is that correct?

@Mamba413 Mamba413 self-assigned this Jun 30, 2023
@Mamba413 Mamba413 added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 30, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants