You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 11, 2020. It is now read-only.
We are seeking input from the community about the need for goblin to support python 2.7. Are you using goblin with python2? If you are using, or planning to use, goblin, please comment below and let us know what version of python you are using.
We are seriously considering dropping support for python 2.7 for several reasons, including (but not limited to) the following:
In order to support both python 2.7 (with tornado) and python 3.3+ (with the choice of tornado or asyncio), goblin's code base is currently written in callback style. This makes for code that is significantly more difficult to read, debug, and update compared to code that uses the tools available for writing asynchronous code in python 3.3+. Removing support for 2.7 would allow us to lift the goblin codebase out of callback hell and move more quickly on bugfixes and feature development.
Tinkerpop and Titan are fairly new technologies. Python 2.x had already been the legacy version of python for some time when titan saw its first release. Thus we think it unlikely that there are a lot of legacy python2 projects written for titan. Furthermore, converting an application written for a traditional database to leverage Titan necessitates extensive redesign; this is arguably a lot more involved than porting a project from python 2 to python 3, which for most projects requires a lot of small changes but doesn't really need to involve fundamentally redesigning an app. This is especially true now that the vast majority of major python packages have been ported to python 3.
The future of asynchronous programming in python (not to mention the future of the python language as a whole) is all about python 3
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
In JavaScript there is something called Callback Hell, it makes things very hard to read, troubleshoot and understand. Python 2 was not meant to be asynchronous so there are very limited things that could be done to avoid callback hell related issues without rewriting everything from scratch and I think that, in the effort of future proofing our code we should indeed drop support for Python 2.
Yes, the current code base could be restructured to allow for better debugging and make it easier to read and understand but I think the development efforts should be aimed towards the future of the technologies rather than using what's old and somewhat hacky.
We are seeking input from the community about the need for goblin to support python 2.7. Are you using goblin with python2? If you are using, or planning to use, goblin, please comment below and let us know what version of python you are using.
We are seriously considering dropping support for python 2.7 for several reasons, including (but not limited to) the following:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: