Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Find a more consistent terminology #11

Open
Bernhard10 opened this issue Sep 2, 2016 · 3 comments
Open

Find a more consistent terminology #11

Bernhard10 opened this issue Sep 2, 2016 · 3 comments
Milestone

Comments

@Bernhard10
Copy link
Member

Bernhard10 commented Sep 2, 2016

Sometimes we use node, sometiem element for coarse grained elements.

E.g. get_node_from_residue_num and nucleotides_to_elements do similar things but have different names.

Also the words loop, bulge, stem, element, interior loop are sometimes used incorrectly/ inconsistently

Do we call "i1", "s0", ... element names?

@Bernhard10
Copy link
Member Author

Another example is fasta/ fastax/ ss_fasta.

Do we make a difference between fasta files and fasta+structure files?

@Bernhard10
Copy link
Member Author

For forgi 2.0, I tried to use elem for the keys to rna.defines and define only for the values (i.e. list of ints)

@Bernhard10
Copy link
Member Author

For forgi 3.0, we should again check the terminology and make it even more consistent.

@Bernhard10 Bernhard10 added this to the 3.0 milestone Feb 18, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant