Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Mar 10, 2024. It is now read-only.

the pin continues to be placed on top of the minimize button for UWP apps. #26

Open
kleuton05 opened this issue Jun 19, 2020 · 9 comments

Comments

@kleuton05
Copy link

kleuton05 commented Jun 19, 2020

Version 2.4 fixed the problem for win32 apps only (#23), please fix it for UWP.

SharedScreenshot

@VictorZakharov VictorZakharov self-assigned this Jun 19, 2020
@VictorZakharov
Copy link
Owner

VictorZakharov commented Jun 21, 2020

I'm able to reproduce, but...

Supporting UWP requires upgrade to .NET 4.6+, which breaks XP support. PinWin currently works on XP for those really old PCs (yes, I have those users).
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60581121/how-to-add-a-reference-to-the-windows-applicationmodel-datatransfer-namespace-in
https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/framework/get-started/system-requirements
@kleuton05

@VictorZakharov VictorZakharov removed their assignment Jun 21, 2020
@VictorZakharov
Copy link
Owner

VictorZakharov commented Jun 21, 2020

I am trying to gauge interest to justify framework upgrade. Please feel free to vote and/or add comments on this ticket. If I do upgrade, it will be on another/new repo.

@VictorZakharov
Copy link
Owner

VictorZakharov commented Jun 21, 2020

Updated "known issues" in readme file with link to this ticket.

@AuroraDysis
Copy link

I really want to pin the Microsoft Sticky Notes, +1 for uwp.

@VictorZakharov
Copy link
Owner

@AuroraDysis You can pin them right now. No update is necessary.
image

@Get-ThingsRubenMade
Copy link

Just adding my vote here to upgrade the framework. Anyone on XP should already be ashamed anyways.

@VictorZakharov
Copy link
Owner

VictorZakharov commented Apr 19, 2022

@RVL-Solutions Total Commander supports all Windows from 3.1 through 11. https://www.ghisler.com/

@Get-ThingsRubenMade
Copy link

Thanks and excuse my possible ignorance, but I don't see how Total Commander' support coverage is relevant to PinWin?

@VictorZakharov
Copy link
Owner

VictorZakharov commented Apr 19, 2022

@RVL-Solutions An example when author maintains a wide range of supported OS in a single product. This approach typically has trade-offs in terms of what can be done, and what can feasibly be done. I shared this example to prove that not all tools support just Windows 10, despite the industry pushing towards it, which inevitably drives public opinion and expectations.

Regarding UWP support, check this out:

Sounds like UWP is dead, same with MS Store, might not be feasible to support it. The article is from 2019.

More articles on the topic from 2021:

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants