You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The file MD-pos.json contains heuristics to guess the POS annotation for MD entries. However, they may not be as precise as they can. e.j. yahaw and ahpô used to map to Part, while they could map to IPJ and IPC, respectively. I've made some candidate changes, but I believe a linguist should check (and perhaps extend) this set of mappings to get more precise info in the importjson.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have a fuzzy recollection of creating this equivalence file ages ago - the problem is that wrt FST it is underspecified, and we might need to add in the actual lexical (inflectional) classes manually anyhow, in the MD_LexCat field that we have for MD.
In this and other respects, I've been tweaking a script that tries to copy over the stem and lexical category fields from CW to MD, always when available, so that we are not reliant on Arok's CW having that information (e.g. for generating FSTs), if he would happen to change his mind. The script for that is: crk/bin/add-cw_lemma-stem-and-lexcat-from-cw-2-md.sh and the resultant file: crk/generated/Maskwacis_altlab2.tsv - the latter will need some manual editing before replacing the ALTLab version of MD in crk/dicts/.
The file MD-pos.json contains heuristics to guess the POS annotation for MD entries. However, they may not be as precise as they can. e.j.
yahaw
andahpô
used to map toPart
, while they could map toIPJ
andIPC
, respectively. I've made some candidate changes, but I believe a linguist should check (and perhaps extend) this set of mappings to get more precise info in the importjson.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: