Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

AECD: Incorporate AECD among the aggregated itwêwina dictionary sources #102

Open
5 tasks done
aarppe opened this issue Jun 12, 2022 · 3 comments
Open
5 tasks done
Labels
aggregation Changes to the aggregation algorithm import JSON Changes to the generation of the import JSON meta Issues for tracking issues

Comments

@aarppe aarppe added meta Issues for tracking issues aggregation Changes to the aggregation algorithm import JSON Changes to the generation of the import JSON labels Jun 12, 2022
@aarppe aarppe changed the title AECD: Incorporate AECD within the aggregated itwêwina dictionary sources AECD: Incorporate AECD among the aggregated itwêwina dictionary sources Jun 12, 2022
@aarppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

aarppe commented Jun 13, 2022

@nienna73 Created this meta-issue for co-ordinating the aggregation of AECD. Due to Daniel's speed, we now know that we could "easily" aggregate close to 75% of the AECD content, and that is sufficient for us to proceed, while we'll sort out what to do with the remaining 25%.

@aarppe
Copy link
Contributor Author

aarppe commented Aug 2, 2022

The first versions of all the subtasks above have been implemented, resulting in some follow-up tasks, e.g. #105.

@aarppe aarppe closed this as completed Aug 2, 2022
@aarppe aarppe reopened this Aug 2, 2022
@fbanados
Copy link
Member

This is almost done, but in the aecd/ branch. Once we merge this could be closed.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
aggregation Changes to the aggregation algorithm import JSON Changes to the generation of the import JSON meta Issues for tracking issues
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants