Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Hardening / Lockdown mode #16

Open
Dramelac opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 4 comments
Open

Hardening / Lockdown mode #16

Dramelac opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 4 comments
Labels
images Docker images wrapper Wrapper

Comments

@Dramelac
Copy link
Member

Have a local firewall, limited capabilities, virtual env around docker on the host, non-root user inside Docker, and many more security enforcement to be able to use Exegol in sensitive contexts, limit operational security risks, etc.

@Dramelac Dramelac moved this to Considering in Exegol roadmap May 14, 2024
@Dramelac
Copy link
Member Author

@Dramelac Dramelac added images Docker images wrapper Wrapper labels May 14, 2024
@GRodolphe
Copy link

Hello, using a tool like docker bench can provide an initial overview of the "health status" of Docker images. I can scan the images and share the results if that seems relevant. I also offer to help with hardening.

@Dramelac
Copy link
Member Author

Hello, using a tool like docker bench can provide an initial overview of the "health status" of Docker images. I can scan the images and share the results if that seems relevant. I also offer to help with hardening.

Hello

Not sure what kind of "best practice" this tools is looking for. Exegol-image is not a service image "as usual" so there is a lots of difference. But i can still be interesting to see.

I think the hardening part will be more container oriented, regarding config, volume, apparmor options etc..
But if we can improve image-side too it can be interesting and added to the card !

@GRodolphe
Copy link

Hello, using a tool like docker bench can provide an initial overview of the "health status" of Docker images. I can scan the images and share the results if that seems relevant. I also offer to help with hardening.

Hello

Not sure what kind of "best practice" this tools is looking for. Exegol-image is not a service image "as usual" so there is a lots of difference. But i can still be interesting to see.

I think the hardening part will be more container oriented, regarding config, volume, apparmor options etc.. But if we can improve image-side too it can be interesting and added to the card !

Oh ok I see, I will dig this subject

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
images Docker images wrapper Wrapper
Projects
Status: Considering
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants