Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use the TIC As Input Catalog Rather than UCAC4 #40

Open
xcthulhu opened this issue Oct 7, 2016 · 2 comments
Open

Use the TIC As Input Catalog Rather than UCAC4 #40

xcthulhu opened this issue Oct 7, 2016 · 2 comments

Comments

@xcthulhu
Copy link
Member

xcthulhu commented Oct 7, 2016

Now that the TIC has had a preliminary release, it is time to migrate TESS off of UCAC4

@rkvanderspek
Copy link

Different applications may want different TICs, so we should discuss what level of flexibility is needed.

On Oct 7, 2016, at 1:54 PM, Matthew Wampler-Doty [email protected] wrote:

Now that the TIC has had a preliminary release, it is time to migrate TESS off of UCAC4


You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub #40, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AK3fY3huUAw5Q17jhRKtzVl5Tpz2rNHeks5qxodxgaJpZM4KRS3Q.

@xcthulhu
Copy link
Member Author

xcthulhu commented Oct 7, 2016

We could have a command line parameter to set it

There are three command line parameters in use already:

  • SPYFFIDATA (sets the data directory)
  • LOG (sets the log level)
  • LOG_FILE (sets where the log file is dumped)

They are implemented here https://github.com/TESScience/SPyFFI/blob/master/settings.py#L14

Alternatively, you could hand the TIC as a field in the input dictionary handed to Observation

This is implemented here https://github.com/TESScience/SPyFFI/blob/master/Observation.py#L24

After that, you would have to hand the argument down to every other method and subobject that Observation produces or calls that might depend on it

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants