Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Keep track of already handled cv's on separate systems #10

Open
PeeHaa opened this issue Jul 20, 2013 · 6 comments
Open

Keep track of already handled cv's on separate systems #10

PeeHaa opened this issue Jul 20, 2013 · 6 comments

Comments

@PeeHaa
Copy link
Member

PeeHaa commented Jul 20, 2013

On a normal working day I'm working on at least 3 different systems.

I would really love to have some way to keep track of cv requests I already handled.

I think this should be doable with either a custom login or an oauth logged in based on the SO account (if this is possible).

Am I alone to think this would be useful?

@MadaraUchiha
Copy link

I think it might be possible. I don't see why not. It would require some thoughts about DB and server-side, but seems doable enough.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 3, 2013

AFAIK this should be possible through the Stack OAuth to authenticate a user then on the our end make profile in database for that user storing their visited posts click-tracked and also I think Stack API should allow seeing if the user has already voted on a post. I'll look into that part when I have the time.

@MadaraUchiha
Copy link

I really must learn the Stack API one day :|

On Sat, Aug 3, 2013 at 5:17 AM, Kyra D. [email protected] wrote:

AFAIK this should be possible through the Stack OAuth to authenticate a
user then on the our end make profile in database for that user storing
their visited posts click-tracked and also I think Stack API should allow
seeing if the user has already voted on a post. I'll look into that part
when I have the time.


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/10#issuecomment-22046783
.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Aug 3, 2013

Setting the authentication scope to the following I would expect we should be able to access voting history. I can't figure out how through the API what object would return voting info. Possibly might not be such an object made yet.

private_info - access full history of a user's private actions on the site.

Also I am rather hesitant to have people grant such access to the app. It's like hey everyone gimme the keys to your private stuff and we'll make your life more convenient. I wonder if the API allows you to fine tune the permissions. I know some OAuth apps will notify the user of what information is being allowed to be accessed when they are prompted for access. If so, then I would be fine with it since all we would access is the close/delete vote history. Both of which are not a privacy concern as much as up/down votes.

Update

See: http://stackapps.com/questions/4260/accessing-authenticated-users-close-delete-history
Upvote the crap out of that so we can get that feature implemented.

@DaveRandom
Copy link
Member

FYI API v2.2 is just around the corner, SE are currently testing a mobile app that uses it. I know it contains a lot more in the way of writeable methods for authenticated users, it may quite possibly provide deeper access to profile info as well - you could always go and ask in the Tavern on meta but past experience tells me they won't give much away before its released.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 14, 2013

@DaveRandom I asked about this and seems like it won't have such access =o(

The only thing I can think of doing as an alternative is to have the cv-pls plugin submit the question ids voted on to cv-pls.com which will store it in users vote table so can then filter those out on an authenticated user. Otherwise no way to ensure persistent tracking across multiple systems. Thoughts?

@ghost ghost self-assigned this Sep 27, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants