You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
It would be interesting to have the possibility to numerically simulate the full Ising Hamiltonian (as an Hermitian complex matrix) time evolution during the annealing process. This would allow to study for instance the behaviour over time of the minimum energy gap (i.e. difference between the lowest eigenvalue $\lambda_0$, corresponding to the Hamiltonian ground state, and the second-lowest eigenvalue $\lambda_1$, corresponding to the Hamiltonian first excited state).
The superconducting QPU at the heart of the D‑Wave quantum annealing system is a controllable, physical realization of the quantum Ising spin system in a transverse field. Analog control lines enables to implement the following time-dependent Hamiltonian:
In the equation above, $\hat{\sigma}_{x}$ and $\hat{\sigma}_{z}$ represent the Pauli-X and Pauli-Z matrix operators, $h_{i}$ and $J_{i,j}$ are the linear and quadratic coefficients defining the final Hamiltonian (encoding the optimization problem), and the functions $A(s)$ and $B(s)$ control the annealing schedule ($s$ is time rescaled in $[0,1]$). See D-Wave Systems docs for an extensive description of the quantum annealing implementation and controls.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
To make it more efficient, a sparse representation of the Hamiltonian matrix could be used (see scipy.sparse module). Note that the linalg sub-module provides for instance the function eigsh(A, k=2, which='SA') to compute the first $k=2$ smallest eigenvalues of an Hermitian sparse matrix $A$.
It would be interesting to have the possibility to numerically simulate the full Ising Hamiltonian (as an Hermitian complex matrix) time evolution during the annealing process. This would allow to study for instance the behaviour over time of the minimum energy gap (i.e. difference between the lowest eigenvalue$\lambda_0$ , corresponding to the Hamiltonian ground state, and the second-lowest eigenvalue $\lambda_1$ , corresponding to the Hamiltonian first excited state).
The superconducting QPU at the heart of the D‑Wave quantum annealing system is a controllable, physical realization of the quantum Ising spin system in a transverse field. Analog control lines enables to implement the following time-dependent Hamiltonian:
In the equation above,$\hat{\sigma}_{x}$ and $\hat{\sigma}_{z}$ represent the Pauli-X and Pauli-Z matrix operators, $h_{i}$ and $J_{i,j}$ are the linear and quadratic coefficients defining the final Hamiltonian (encoding the optimization problem), and the functions $A(s)$ and $B(s)$ control the annealing schedule ($s$ is time rescaled in $[0,1]$ ). See D-Wave Systems docs for an extensive description of the quantum annealing implementation and controls.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: