Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pathagar's OPDS feed throws warnings on validation #33

Open
sethwoodworth opened this issue Aug 10, 2013 · 0 comments
Open

Pathagar's OPDS feed throws warnings on validation #33

sethwoodworth opened this issue Aug 10, 2013 · 0 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@sethwoodworth
Copy link
Contributor

Cool, thanks Sameer.

The checker throws these errors:

Line 7, Column 82 OPDS links SHOULD use profile parameter in type
Line 7, Column 82 OPDS links SHOULD use kind parameter in type
Line 8, Column 83 OPDS links SHOULD use profile parameter in type
Line 8, Column 83 OPDS links SHOULD use kind parameter in type

  1. That

Googling that message let me to this part of the OPDS spec on Navigation Feeds

Links to Navigation Feeds SHOULD use the "type" attribute "application/atom+xml;profile=opds-catalog;kind=navigation".

On Fri, Aug 9, 2013 at 3:32 PM, Sameer Verma [email protected] wrote:
I found a OPDS validator for the feed that Pathagar provides.
https://opds-validator.appspot.com/ (See
http://opds-spec.org/2011/11/16/validate-your-opds-feeds-online/)

I haven't tried with the latest Pathagar build on github, but what we
have running as a demo for Jamaica is at http://108.171.173.65/ and
the feed is at http://108.171.173.65/latest.atom

It validates, which is good news, but spits out warnings (2 for
version 1.0 and 4 for version 1.1)

Same goes for
http://108.171.173.65/by-title.atom
http://108.171.173.65/by-author..atom
http://108.171.173.65/by-popularity.atom

cheers,
Sameer

@adborden adborden added this to the 1.0 milestone Mar 29, 2015
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants