Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve documentation and performance of CSync #283

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

Enquier
Copy link
Contributor

@Enquier Enquier commented May 29, 2024

@@ -161,7 +166,13 @@ private enum Processor {
DOCUMENTATION_PRE(
(element, project, objectNode) -> {
//Todo: FIgure out how to read this stuff and parse the <a tags from MD
// String doc_text = (String) Utils.getElementAttribute(element, Utils.AvailableAttribute.Documentation);
String doc_text = (String) Utils.getElementAttribute(element, Utils.AvailableAttribute.Documentation);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

don't think this is completely implemented? the parsed doc isn't used anywhere, there's no mms-cf attr added, and should have a try catch surrounding it in case jsoup fails, also it'll lead to a diff since the output on mms will then be different to the model, think this should commented out and revisited later


ProjectValidator pv = new ProjectValidator(project);
pv.validate();
ProgressStatusRunner.runWithProgressStatus(pv, "Coordinated Sync: Project Validation", true, 0);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

is the reason why it's starting a new runner instead of calling pv.run(progressStatus) because it's changing to indeterminate?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

JavaFX libraries are still not embedding correctly.
2 participants