Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Master: LET SGOFLET and SWOFLET Issue. #3432

Open
OPMUSER opened this issue Mar 8, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Master: LET SGOFLET and SWOFLET Issue. #3432

OPMUSER opened this issue Mar 8, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@OPMUSER
Copy link
Contributor

OPMUSER commented Mar 8, 2023

There appears to be an inconsistency with the generation of relative permeability curves using the aforementioned keywords.

If I use pyscl and the pyscal example to generate the relative permeability curves, and then use the same example data set with the SGOFLET and SWOFLET keywords, I get different relative permeability when they should be the same.

For SATNUM 1, the pyscal oil-water relative permeability looks like this:

image

If I run OPM Flow, load the results into OPM ResInsight, and display the SATNUM 1 oil-water relative permeability curves, I get this:

image

Notice how the oil permeability set to one below SWL/SWCR, and more importantly that KRW is not extrapolated to one.

The gas-oil relative permeability curves, have similar problems. Here pyscal gives:
image

and SGOFLET gives:

image

I have attached both my test simulation deck and the pyscal example, for reference.

LET-01.zip
pyscal.zip

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant