QEMUv7: xtest pkcs11_1007 sporadic failure

[etienne-lms]

xtest pkcs11_1007 (requires to build with CFG_PKCS11_TA=y) sporadically fails with unexpected error code CKR_HOST_MEMORY on various platforms, including qemu_virt, qeu_armv8a, stm32mp1 (for I one i've tests).
References found in Github optee_os forum:
#5395 (comment) (July 2022, maybe unrelated)
#5359 (comment) (May 2023)
#6125 (comment) (June 2023)
#6922 (comment) (June 2024)
#6881 (comment) (July 2024)

I open this Issue to track it. I've started to look closer at this and will post my current findings (that are still weak).

[etienne-lms]

I was able to reproduce the issue. Traces indeed seen show a "host memory" allocation failure, while we would expect that this test exhausts the "device memory" (aka OP-TEE core or TA memory) .

.../out-br/build/optee_test_ext-1.0/host/xtest/pkcs11_1000.c:1792: rv has an unexpected value: 0x2 = CKR_HOST_MEMORY, expected 0xb3 = CKR_SESSION_HANDLE_INVALID
.../out-br/build/optee_test_ext-1.0/host/xtest/pkcs11_1000.c:1794: rv has an unexpected value: 0x2 = CKR_HOST_MEMORY, expected 0xb3 = CKR_SESSION_HANDLE_INVALID
.../out-br/build/optee_test_ext-1.0/host/xtest/pkcs11_1000.c:1796: rv has an unexpected value: 0x2 = CKR_HOST_MEMORY, expected 0xb3 = CKR_SESSION_HANDLE_INVALID
...

They relate to pkcs11_1000.c source file tests:

line 1769:	for (n = 0; n < ARRAY_SIZE(sessions); n++) {
			...
line 1783	}
		...

line 1791:	/* Closing session with out bound and invalid IDs (or negative ID) */
line 1792:	rv = C_CloseSession(sessions[n - 1] + 1024);
line 1793:	ADBG_EXPECT_CK_RESULT(c, CKR_SESSION_HANDLE_INVALID, rv);
line 1794:	rv = C_CloseSession(CK_INVALID_HANDLE);
line 1795:	ADBG_EXPECT_CK_RESULT(c, CKR_SESSION_HANDLE_INVALID, rv);
line 1796:	rv = C_CloseSession(~0);
line 1797:	ADBG_EXPECT_CK_RESULT(c, CKR_SESSION_HANDLE_INVALID, rv);

I saw also some unexpected error traces from OP-TEE core that are emitted in the loop (that attempts to open more than a hundred sessions) before line 1792 above is called, so I think the issue is deeper than a libckteec (PKCS#11 crypoki client lib) issue:

E/TC:1 0 std_entry_with_parg:234 Bad arg address 0xc2451000
E/TC:1 0 std_entry_with_parg:234 Bad arg address 0xc266c000

When the issue occurs, that loop stops on a "host memory" error, whereas when pkcs11_1007 test succeeds (at it most often does), the loop stops on a "device memory" error, as expected.

I'll continue to investigate. I think they are some Linux OS resources that are not properly released in xtest.

[jenswi-linaro]

E/TC:1 0 std_entry_with_parg:234 Bad arg address 0xc2451000

This error suggests that the normal world uses a non-secure address that OP-TEE isn't aware of.

[etienne-lms]

E/TC:1 0 std_entry_with_parg:234 Bad arg address 0xc2451000

This error suggests that the normal world uses a non-secure address that OP-TEE isn't aware of.

I looks like client is invoking OP-TEE with an shm buffer that failed to be registered, but I can't find where this can happen.

Regarding pkcs11_1007 sporadic failures, i think it comes from that fact we try to invoke OP-TEE for closing invalid session handlers (lines 1792 to 1797 shown in the comment above) while OP-TEE core heap memory is already exhausted. I'll propose a change to release some resources before we use make these attempts.

[github-actions]

This issue has been marked as a stale issue because it has been open (more than) 30 days with no activity. Remove the stale label or add a comment, otherwise this issue will automatically be closed in 5 days. Note, that you can always re-open a closed issue at any time.

[etienne-lms]

FYI, P-R OP-TEE/optee_test#758 attempts to address the issue but it's not obvious to me it will really fix it. I'll let this Issue be closed is no such failure is reported by new P-Rs' CI tests.

[GseoC]

Log: Reproduced today on https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/pull/7014. However, I resubmitted my patches so I lost the CI logs :/

[jforissier]

Log: Reproduced today on https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/pull/7014. However, I resubmitted my patches so I lost the CI logs :/

Still visible here: https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/actions/runs/11071874169/job/30764736296
Previous runs for PRs can be found on the GitHub Actions page: https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/actions
But the logs are cleaned up after some time, that is true.

[etienne-lms]

Thanks for reporting the issue. So it was not addressed.
The CI Test logs do not provide much information: CI test is not very verbose, I understand that. Only says "pkcs11_1007 FAIL". I'll respend time on this issue.

In the mean time, to not bother contributors with this sporadic issue, @jforissier would you be okay to specifically disable xtest pkcs11_1007. It does not cover any pkcs11 crypto or login tests, only session open/close specific cases.

[jforissier]

Thanks for reporting the issue. So it was not addressed.
The CI Test logs do not provide much information: CI test is not very verbose, I understand that. Only says "pkcs11_1007 FAIL". I'll respend time on this issue.

We could make the CI show the full console output of the container (out/bin/serial0.log and out/bin/serial1.log) by setting DUMP_LOGS_ON_ERROR to a non-empty value. Not sure it would help much though.

In the mean time, to not bother contributors with this sporadic issue, @jforissier would you be okay to specifically disable xtest pkcs11_1007. It does not cover any pkcs11 crypto or login tests, only session open/close specific cases.

Fine with me. Adding XTEST_ARGS="-x pkcs11_1007" should be enough to skip that one.

[etienne-lms]

Created #7061.
FYI, digging into CI test failures in https://github.com/OP-TEE/optee_os/actions history, I only saw occurrences for qemuv7 platform.

[jforissier]

I don't recall seeing this failure on other platforms than qemuv7 indeed. Let's add QEMUv7 to the title.

[github-actions]

This issue has been marked as a stale issue because it has been open (more than) 30 days with no activity. Remove the stale label or add a comment, otherwise this issue will automatically be closed in 5 days. Note, that you can always re-open a closed issue at any time.

[etienne-lms]

The issue seems to have disappeared. However, I suggest we keep this entry opened, at least until next release tag (jan'25).

[jforissier]

The issue seems to have disappeared. However, I suggest we keep this entry opened, at least until next release tag (jan'25).

If I'm not mistaken, 1007 has been disabled in CI, so what makes you think that the issue has disappeared?