NX partitionning problem with Kirkstone build - UDA #1491
Unanswered
andregirard37
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
-
Are there any entries in the storage layout XML that have a |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
2 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hello,
I am migrating my Yocto build from Dunfell to Kirkstone. We have applications running on a custom partition, let's call it APPS. For that, we are using the UDA partition to give us the remaining space on the device, as described by:
On the Dunfell build, it would give us 5Gbytes or so of space. But for some reasons on the Kirkstone build, we only get 101MBytes left:
lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINTS
mmcblk0 179:0 0 14.7G 0 disk
|-mmcblk0p1 179:1 0 8G 0 part /
|-mmcblk0p2 179:2 0 64M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p3 179:3 0 448K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p4 179:4 0 32.5M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p5 179:5 0 2.5M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p6 179:6 0 64K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p7 179:7 0 1M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p8 179:8 0 1M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p9 179:9 0 1M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p10 179:10 0 1.5M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p11 179:11 0 1M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p12 179:12 0 64M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p13 179:13 0 448K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p14 179:14 0 32.5M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p15 179:15 0 80M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p16 179:16 0 512K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p17 179:17 0 100M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p18 179:18 0 64M 0 part /opt/nvidia/esp
| /boot/efi
|-mmcblk0p19 179:19 0 80M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p20 179:20 0 512K 0 part
|-mmcblk0p21 179:21 0 64M 0 part
|-mmcblk0p22 179:22 0 101M 0 part /apps
Adding up all the SIZE above, we are far from the 14.7G, so I don't understand why mmcblk0p22 is not way greater than 101M. Is there some reserved space I am aware of or is there something I am missing on the flash.xml.in ?
Thank you!
Andre
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions