We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
unitless is not commonly accepted as a valid unit description.
unitless
Update the addfld descriptions in oslo_aero_diagnostics to use more relevant descriptions (e.g., kg kg-1, ln(W W-1)).
addfld
kg kg-1
ln(W W-1)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Is "dimensionless" better than "unitless" The meaning is the same. And yes, for aerosol optical depth it is the correct unit, see e.g https://darktarget.gsfc.nasa.gov/basic-definitions
Sorry, something went wrong.
The accepted unit for this type of unitless quantity is 1. See the relevant CF Convention fields (search for "optical").
1
Yes you are correct. Sorry about the confusion
No branches or pull requests
unitless
is not commonly accepted as a valid unit description.Update the
addfld
descriptions in oslo_aero_diagnostics to use more relevant descriptions (e.g.,kg kg-1
,ln(W W-1)
).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: