Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Check impact on CDNUMC of 103 vs 104 configuration in a FLTHIST. #582

Closed
cecilehannay opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Closed

Check impact on CDNUMC of 103 vs 104 configuration in a FLTHIST. #582

cecilehannay opened this issue Sep 6, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Run request Label for CAM developpers who requested a new development simulation

Comments

@cecilehannay
Copy link
Collaborator

cecilehannay commented Sep 6, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Purpose of the run

Check impact on CDNUMC of 103 vs 104 configuration.

Description of the run

2 FLTHIST runs starting at 1900

Namelist modifications

@cmcclus will provide special output. Anybody else is welcome to add what they want.

Sandbox

Same as coupled 103/104 (beta02)

Contact info

@cecilehannay, @brianpm, @swrneale, @PeterHjortLauritzen, @islasimpson , @adamrher,@cmcclus

Any other relevant information

Enter relevant info
@cecilehannay cecilehannay added the Run request Label for CAM developpers who requested a new development simulation label Sep 6, 2024
@cecilehannay
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Runs started: See #583 and #584

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
Run request Label for CAM developpers who requested a new development simulation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@cecilehannay