Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

New FLTHIST baseline with cam6_3_132 #416

Closed
PeterHjortLauritzen opened this issue Oct 18, 2023 · 3 comments
Closed

New FLTHIST baseline with cam6_3_132 #416

PeterHjortLauritzen opened this issue Oct 18, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
Run request Label for CAM developpers who requested a new development simulation

Comments

@PeterHjortLauritzen
Copy link

PeterHjortLauritzen commented Oct 18, 2023

Description of the run

New FLTHIST baseline with cam6_3_132 to approximately match coupled run 52 (#413)

Note that there is a CMEPS change that was not in coupled run 52: ESCOMP/CMEPS#394

Suffix in the casename

f.cam6_3_132.FLTHIST_ne30.001

Namelist modifications

N/A

Source modifications

N/A

Sandbox

/glade/work/pel/cesm_tags/cam6_3_132

Contact info

@cecilehannay @adamrher @JulioTBacmeister

Any other relevant information

No response

@PeterHjortLauritzen PeterHjortLauritzen added the Run request Label for CAM developpers who requested a new development simulation label Oct 18, 2023
@cecilehannay
Copy link
Collaborator

@tilmes: I would like also to get Simone's advice on dust. Simone requested a couple of runs to tune the dust.
I think her favorite configuration was: #393
but we didn't include that at the time because we wanted to keep a clean comparison.
As we are doing a new baseline, it might be good to include this now.

@tilmes
Copy link

tilmes commented Oct 18, 2023

@cecilehannay I would recommend to use this, since AODDUST of 0.031 is pretty good.
dust_emis_fact = 1.3

@PeterHjortLauritzen
Copy link
Author

See #417

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Run request Label for CAM developpers who requested a new development simulation
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants