You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Some of the scenarios have a GraphInfoDir setting which points to nonexistent directories, causing workflow failures.
There are also a number of different directories being pointed to by various scenarios, which we may want to change to be uniform?
Another thing, I noted that in the reference tests you mentioned about the graph file missing. This is because is using /glade/work/liuz/pandac/prepare_mpas/mpas_static_30km as the path for the GraphInfoDir variable, but this folder does not exist anymore. This is also used in scenarios/VerifyingGFSAnalysesFromRDA.yaml. I would suggest to remove the path from the scenario yaml files and use the default path for GraphInfoDir specified in data/Model.py.
We are using graphs from /glade/work/duda/static_moved_to_campaign (in some scenario yamls) and /glade/campaign/mmm/parc/liuz/pandac_common/static_from_duda (default path), however, my guess is that we could use just /glade/campaign/mmm/parc/liuz/pandac_common/static_from_duda.
To Reproduce
Run the ForecastFromGFSAnalysesMPT test scenario.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Some of the scenarios have a GraphInfoDir setting which points to nonexistent directories, causing workflow failures.
There are also a number of different directories being pointed to by various scenarios, which we may want to change to be uniform?
As noted by @ibanos90 in PR #306
To Reproduce
Run the
ForecastFromGFSAnalysesMPT
test scenario.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: