Docs: promoting to production #162
Conversation
| @@ -76,10 +76,15 @@ | |||
| "source": [ | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this notebook be moved to veda-docs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Agree that this should move to veda-docs
anayeaye
changed the title
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| </details> | ||
|
|
||
| ## Validation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
@anayeaye as part of the validation should we also create json schema that includes our minimum requirements for collection metadata to maintain consistency across the production catalog? For example, all collections in VEDA must include:
- providers
- thumbnails assets
- renders
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ooof I just included those there in an optional section in the updated geoglam notebook that is now runnable in the hub https://github.com/NASA-IMPACT/veda-docs/blob/c9dc33a8f2960fa29a59db2974f979b12055f8ca/contributing/dataset-ingestion/example-template/example-geoglam-ingest.ipynb
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't disagree on a firm nudge to create renders and thumbnails but I don't think we should require them until we have great docs on how to set them up + a way for users to upload thumbs (which are both doable)
What
This is phase one of upgrading our ingestion documentation. The goal is to update the veda-docs/contributing pages with current links and examples. More changes for automation are planned soon (#161) but should hopefully only require a small update to the README. https://github.com/NASA-IMPACT/veda-data/pull/162/files#diff-b335630551682c19a781afebcf4d07bf978fb1f8ac04c6bf87428ed5106870f5R149