Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deciding on features for evalem.cv #19

Open
rbavery opened this issue May 23, 2023 · 4 comments
Open

Deciding on features for evalem.cv #19

rbavery opened this issue May 23, 2023 · 4 comments

Comments

@rbavery
Copy link

rbavery commented May 23, 2023

So far we have discussed

  • running on N batches, chosen by the user
  • selecting the correct batch size depending on the amount of GPU memory.
  • defaulting to CPU if no gpu is available
  • supporting flexible array types (ndarray, torch tensor, cupy array)
  • model specific input processor, possibly using transformers, see integration with huggingface transformers? #18
  • selecting the correct set of metrics for semantic segmentation (initially, and then other downstream tasks)
  • adding dependencies for torchmetrics, possibly torcheval if needed for semantic segmentation (definitely for object detection, COCO mAP)
@weiji14
Copy link
Member

weiji14 commented May 25, 2023

Initial focus will probably be on supporting different dowstream Computer Vision tasks (segmentation, detection, classification), which would require wrapping around torchmetrics, smp, mmeval or some other metric library. We can start with torch.Tensor as the array format to get a proof of concept going, but just keep in mind about flexible array types later.

@NISH1001
Copy link
Collaborator

@weiji14 @rbavery I am following up if we can add any metric implementation for evalem.cv.metrics.

@rbavery
Copy link
Author

rbavery commented Jun 26, 2023

Yes we can, right now I'm focused on a higher priority task to get a reproducible evaluation example in the hls foundation repo. Setting up the aws vm with all the dependencies and files has taken some time but that should be done today and I can start on this after.

@NISH1001
Copy link
Collaborator

Eh okay. No worries. Just keeping this thread in the loop.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants