You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Piling everyone's money into a shared pile, and then trying to agree on how to spend it cannot be a secure way of spending your money.
The problem is that there can be countless proposals for how the money should be spent.
According to Arrows Impossibility theorem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow%27s_impossibility_theorem there is no way for us to make a good choice on how to spend the money, if there are more than 2 alternatives.
Dominant assurance contracts solve the free rider problem, because each person is incentivized to participate in proportion to how much they think the public good will benefit them.
Piling everyone's money into a shared pile, and then trying to agree on how to spend it cannot be a secure way of spending your money.
The problem is that there can be countless proposals for how the money should be spent.
According to Arrows Impossibility theorem https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arrow%27s_impossibility_theorem there is no way for us to make a good choice on how to spend the money, if there are more than 2 alternatives.
The correct way to raise money for public goods is with dominant assurance contracts, like on page 14 of this pdf http://bitcoinhivemind.com/papers/3_PM_Applications.pdf
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: