-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 55
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Problem/Bug]: Webview 131.0.2903.48 control panel entry mysteriousely disappeared #4931
Comments
Is your app able to pick it up? Could you please share installer logs? |
EdgeFiles.txt Hope it can help! Steps to reproduce: From webview2 130.0.2849.80 do a winget update |
For some reason on one of my machines (not all of them), I realised that also Edge has vanished from control panel. I had to go tweak the registry to make it visible again. That trick doesn't seem to work with Webview2 tho. |
You should tag this on my ticket where the issue of installer logs was raised. |
I can confirm this issue, when attempting to install WebView2 silently (using /silent /install), the ARP registry keys are not populated. Logs and a screenshot of the ARP registry key are included. |
I use this key as a SCCM detection. That's how I noticed. All softwares that require Webview2 will fail unless I change my detection method. I guess the best would be to wait to deploy this version everywhere? |
I have the same problem. After the webview update, it no longer appears in the windows settings -> apps. Reinstalling webview doesn't solve the problem either. |
Assuming WV2 is still working and the only delta is the visibility of installation, yes this is intentional - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/deployedge/microsoft-edge-relnote-stable-channel#announcement @orbitalfenestra - For your SCCM purposes, we have our recommended installation detection method here - https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-edge/webview2/concepts/distribution?tabs=dotnetcsharp#detect-if-a-webview2-runtime-is-already-installed . Let me know if that doesn't work for your use-case. |
I'm sorry, why remove the Display name though? The proper, standard way of hiding an application from Add/Remove Programs is to set the SystemComponent registry value. This would prevent a breaking change for users and systems administrators while achieving the same effect. https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/msi/arpsystemcomponent http://www.itninja.com/question/hide-in-add-remove-programs This not only breaks standard detection methods, it also needlessly complicates software inventory collected by ConfigMgr and Intune for this application. I ask that you please reconsider this change and move to adding the SystemComponent registry value instead. |
I was using the Installed Software.Product Name in MECM to create a collection based on the app. That's cut off and this alternate detection method is terrible for that. Is there some reason you can't just use the SystemComponent value that @asjimene references? It seems like the better option and wouldn't break everything like this non-standard change does. |
If it is the case, then will there be some kind of auto-update (like Edge) in SCCM possible ? |
Thanks for the feedback and details. We've paused the rollout of 131 at 5% and are revisiting our implementation to see if we missed this scenario. |
@aluhrs13 Looks like the latest 131.0.2903.63 has fixed this issue by adding the DisplayName back and utilizing SystemComponent. Thank you! |
What happened?
Just updated Webview2 this morning and I noticed that the control panel entry has vanished. Impossible to uninstall it from the control panel.
Importance
Important. My app's user experience is significantly compromised.
Runtime Channel
Stable release (WebView2 Runtime)
Runtime Version
131.0.2903.48
SDK Version
No response
Framework
Win32
Operating System
Windows 11
OS Version
24h2 (26100.2314)
Repro steps
Update webview2 to the latest version (I did with winget)
Repros in Edge Browser
No, issue does not reproduce in the corresponding Edge version
Regression
Don't know
Last working version (if regression)
Previous version
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: