Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Inconsistent implementation of ICRD rules #199

Open
MarcosSueiro opened this issue Feb 1, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Inconsistent implementation of ICRD rules #199

MarcosSueiro opened this issue Feb 1, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@MarcosSueiro
Copy link

MS recomendation states:
ICRD: The ICRD field must be in YYYY, YYYY-MM, YYYY-MM-DD format or initiate with a YYYY-MM-DD formatted string and then include additional free text.

BWF MetaEdit erases free text after YYYY-MM-DD in ICRD

E. g. 2000-10-16 approximately
becomes
2000-10-16

FADGI recommendations state:
ICRD: If the INFO-LIST chunk is used, ICRD must follow ISO 8601

However parts of ISO 8601 (eg date ranges) are deleted/not implemented
@MarcosSueiro MarcosSueiro mentioned this issue Feb 4, 2021
Closed
@g-maxime
Copy link
Contributor

#216 Go to Free text tab if ICRD field contains extra text.

If is sufficient.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@MarcosSueiro @g-maxime