More advanced image compression technology? #35
MasterInQuestion
started this conversation in
Folger
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Do you have interest in deploying more advanced image compression technology?
Currently I'm testing WebP Lossless, and received very promising result:
https://github.com/MasterInQuestion/attach/commit/401c58fc3a56d265feadda567f02d79de93ff10c#r140161715
And I believe lossy ≈ pre-filtered lossless.
Also working on denoise techs yet:
https://trac.ffmpeg.org/wiki/denoise
I would like more feedback from actual data.
Not looking for financial patronage.
Extra note:
https://github.com/MasterInQuestion/talk/discussions/7#img19619
https://digitalcollections.folger.edu/img19619
https://digitalcollections.folger.edu/_flysystem/fedora/2023-07/019619.tif
https://digitalcollections.folger.edu/cantaloupe/iiif/3/_flysystem%2Ffedora%2F2023-07%2F019619.tif/full/pct:50/0/color.jpg
"On-the-fly generated content cannot compete those generated without time/resource constraint."
"Compression may also trade size for speed (useful for intermediate case) or vice versa (archive)."
I believe the IIIF [ https://iiif.io/api/image ] framework maybe pointlessly eating a lot of server resource:
Mostly may be alleviated to client-side.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions