Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing CellDeps in the transactions displayed by Explorer #531

Closed
Flouse opened this issue Jan 22, 2024 · 2 comments
Closed

Missing CellDeps in the transactions displayed by Explorer #531

Flouse opened this issue Jan 22, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@Flouse
Copy link

Flouse commented Jan 22, 2024

#319 seems to be reappearing.

I can't reopen the issue, so I create a new one.

Transaction

https://explorer.nervos.org/transaction/0x42fb5c1bba8db9b03f8468ade8c2f79cbe44f8a47b099b8f22742c070f0345ca

image

@Keith-CY
Copy link
Member

I have figured it out. Last week, due to the Omiga activity, there was a significant increase in the number of transactions in each block. Consequently, the handling of cell deps in each block also increased substantially, impacting the main process. To address this issue, we decided to set the processing of cell deps as an asynchronous worker, typically updating a few seconds later than the corresponding transactions (nervosnetwork/ckb-explorer#1599).

The asynchronous processing approach was also applied to the data of COTA.

However, this morning (1/24), there was an error in the cota-aggregator, resulting in a large number of retry tasks. This, in turn, blocked the cell deps tasks. Now we switched the indexing service of COTA to https://cota.nervina.dev/mainnet-aggregator, and the accumulated tasks are now being executed one by one.

@rabbitz
Copy link

rabbitz commented Jan 26, 2024

Cell dependencies missing data for the period from 2024/01/18 to 2024/01/24 has been synchronized.

@Flouse Flouse closed this as completed Jan 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants