Model-to-model transformation from LearnPAd metamodel to adoxx

[giannirosa]

LearnPAd ATL model tranformation from LearnPAd to adoxx

---

This change is

[codecov-io]

Current coverage is 74.12% (diff: 100%)

No coverage report found for master at 3e1c0db.

Powered by Codecov. Last update 3e1c0db...a45a945

[gulyx]

@giannirosa what is this transformation? how it is used/referred? Does it supposed to substitute anything?

[giannirosa]

@gulyx this is the transformation that convert the models conforms to learnpad metamodel in adoxx format. This is used by the module that Francesco is working on.
It is not substitute anything.

[gulyx]

@giannirosa @Bitico could you include in this PR some models conforming to the Learn PAd MM so that i can check this transformation?
Also, are these models updated with the version of the MM in PR #594 ?

[gulyx]

@giannirosa @Bitico the test model uploaded with commit 2927b6c only refers to a BPMN model ... what's about the other model kinds?

I just noticed that also the transformation deal only with BPMN. Is there any plan to support the others model kinds?

[giannirosa]

The model was provided to me by Jovaldas and it is the export of the
modelling environment Magic Draw.

About your question, I report you the email sent by Jovaldas on Sep 30th,
where you are in cc:

​From MagicDraw will be exported limited scope of BPMN elements. Elements

that will allow to create business process without advanced features. Scope
of elements:

1. ​Start Event plus (Мessage)
2. End Event
3. Data Object
4. Data Association
5. Sequence Flow
6. Exclusive Gateway
7. Parallel Gateway
8. Message Flow
9. Pool with lanes, laneset and childlanset
10. Boundary Event plus (Error, Multiple)
11. Intermediate Catch Event plus (Timеr)
12. Task
13. SubProcess
14. Call Activity

I made as explaination to Jovaldas a model with the whole "Titolo Unico"
process and I can push it on Git if you prefer. I want to emphasize
that the model was made manually by me copying the same in ADOxx.

About the transformation, we plan to support others model kinds in the
future.

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 3:45 PM, gulyx [email protected] wrote:

@giannirosa https://github.com/giannirosa @Bitico
https://github.com/Bitico the test model uploaded with commit 2927b6c
2927b6c
only refers to a BPMN model ... what's about the other model kinds?

I just noticed that also the transformation deal only with BPMN. Is there
any plan to support the others model kinds?

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#595 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALmujo45DSYAAgtDPiTEQzHevsRSbhk1ks5q31mEgaJpZM4KenlO
.

[gulyx]

@giannirosa @Bitico

About the transformation, we plan to support others model kinds in the future.

... really wondering when :-D
I am kidding.

Btw, since the transformation is independent from what actually
MD exports, could you please also work on the processing of the others
model kinds?

Please let me know if it is possible

[giannirosa]

With this transformation I assure to nomagic team to do their demonstration
to the final review.

I am currently working on my PhD thesis, as soon as I guarantee you that
the transformation will be complete on all models.

Regards,
Gianni

On Thu, Oct 27, 2016 at 9:46 AM, gulyx [email protected] wrote:

@giannirosa https://github.com/giannirosa @Bitico
https://github.com/Bitico

About the transformation, we plan to support others model kinds in the
future.

... really wondering when :-D
I am kidding.

Btw, since the transformation is independent from what actually
MD exports, could you please also work on the processing of the others
model kinds?

Please let me know if it is possible

—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#595 (comment),
or mute the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ALmujpYjWSksohTS_13_pj9P3XmDYeySks5q4FbHgaJpZM4KenlO
.