conctact cylinder error: There is no sub model part with name "ComputingContact" in model part "Structure"

[luchete80]

Description
After some corrections to ContactStructuralMechanics app, I've managed to run an old example: contactcylinders with remeshing.
This is documented in repo https://github.com/luchete80/Kratos_tutorials/
I get:

RuntimeError: Error: There is no sub model part with name "ComputingContact" in model part "Structure"
The following sub model parts are available:
"Contact"
"GENERIC_FixedBase"
"GENERIC_Displacement_Auto1"
"SkinModelPart"
"CONTACT_Contact_master_Auto1"
"CONTACT_Contact_slave_Auto1"
"Parts_Solid_Auto1"
"Parts_Solid_Auto2"

This is happening on search_base_process.py, line 223 which clear and regenerate the subModelPart "Contact".

If I replace subpart "Contact" by "ComputingContact" i get:

self.search_utility_list[key] = CSMA.ContactSearchProcess(self.main_model_part, search_parameters, properties_pair)

RuntimeError: Error: AdvancedContactSearch:: Please add the Contact submodelpart to your modelpart list

On the other hand, I see that test_dynamic_search.py

Scope
Where in Kratos is this bug happening.
E.g.

• ContactStructuralMechanicsApplication

To Reproduce
Run the (added here) files:
https://github.com/luchete80/Kratos_tutorials/tree/master/contacting_cylinders_fixin
I've replaced the following fropm branch 9.5:
https://github.com/luchete80/Kratos_tutorials/blob/master/Fixings_Remeshing

Expected behavior
Remesh and continue

Environment

• OS: Ubuntu 22.04
• Branch: Kratos-9.5 release
• Python 3.11

[loumalouomega]

Sorry contact with remeshing is currentñy broken and we could not agree in an interface. This was done in a branch that does not compile anymore (2019 branch)

[luchete80]

Uhm ok, I will try to run it on that one.
Thank you very much!!!

[loumalouomega]

Uhm ok, I will try to run it on that one. Thank you very much!!!

The branch was private and lost

[luchete80]

Oh, what a pity. Is a chance to access to a branch/tag from this current repo with similar characteristics? Like version 6.0 or 7.0? Thanks

[loumalouomega]

Unfortunately not, I uploaded an intermediate branch but it is broken, and the one actually working was in a private computer that I not longer have with me (it was 5 years+ ago)

[loumalouomega]

I could try to revive the thng, but I would like to agree an interface before any job @rubenzorrilla FYI

[rubenzorrilla]

Agree. We can discuss and agree about an upgraded interface and implementation. However, unfortunately at the moment we have no resources to allocate here.

[loumalouomega]

Agree. We can discuss and agree about an upgraded interface and implementation. However, unfortunately at the moment we have no resources to allocate here.

I will think a new design and propose it.