JavaScript library to clean up Mustache templates.
npm install mustache-tidy
var mustacheTidy = require('mustache-tidy');
var cleanTemplate = mustacheTidy(dirtyTemplate);
dirtyTemplate
should be a string with template html.
<script src="mustache-tidy.min.js"></script>
<script>
var cleanTemplate = mustacheTidy(dirtyTemplate);
</script>
dirtyTemplate
should be either a string with template html, or a root DOM Node object of template. If it is a string, result will be returned. If it is a Node object, it will be changed in place.
Second argument is also available.
var cleanTemplate = mustacheTidy(dirtyTemplate, options);
Options is an object with key/name pairs. Currently the only option available is debug
, that should take boolean values. If set to true
, it enables debug console output while executing tidy process.
When creating mustache templates in a WYSIWYG HTML editor (like CKEditor), you may end up with templates that look okay, but are invalid.
{{# foo }}
Hello world
{{/ foo }}
becomes
<p>{{# foo }}</p>
<p>Hello world</p>
<p>{{/ foo }}</p>
This won't be a big issue for a real mustache implementation. But a mustache compatible template engine like Ractive.js is unable to handle such a template, because it makes DOM nodes from both HTML tags and mustache tags.
When cleaned up the template becomes
{{# foo }}
<p>Hello world</p>
{{/ foo }}
Look at another example. Here there might be a sub
variable with a title and intro.
{{ intro }}{{/sub}}
this becomes
<h3>Title {{# sub }}- {{ title }}</h3>
<p>{{ intro }}{{/sub}}</p>
When sub
is null
, it's turned into invalid HTML
<h3>Title</p>
When cleaned up the template becomes
<h3>Title {{# sub }}- {{ title }}{{/ sub}}</h3>
{{# sub }}<p>{{ intro }}</p>{{/sub}}
So the goal of library is to fix tags sections, so that opening and closing tags of section were in the same node.
Tidy process concernes only with tags sections, not with single tags. We distinguish 2 separate cases of section positioning.
- Single tree. One tag is situated in a parent node of it's coupling tag:
<p>
{{# foo }}
<span>
Data
{{/ foo }}
</span>
</p>
- Separate trees. Tags are disconnected from each other, e.g. situated in different node trees, with common ancestor:
<p>
<span>Data{{# foo }}</span>
<span>Data{{/ foo }}</span>
</p>
The following steps are performed for both cases, with small differences. Each tag pair is processed separately of others.
HTML nodes that only contains start and/or end section tags are replaced with the inner content.
<p>{{# foo }}</p>
<p>Hello world</p>
<p>{{# bar }} {{/ bar }}</p>
<p>Hi moon</p>
<p>{{/ foo }}</p>
<p>{{# bar }}Great sun{{/ bar }}</p>
becomes
{{# foo }}
<p>Hello world</p>
{{# bar }} {{/ bar }}
<p>Hi moon</p>
{{/ foo }}
<p>{{# bar }}Great sun{{/ bar }}</p>
This is applyed to the following elements: p, div, span, i, em, strong, li
.
If section tags are not in the same node, we move them, untill they reach common parent node. Tags are moved towards empty end of nodes. If tag reaches node, where there is some data between tag and the end of node, movement is stopped. Tag, that is further from the document root node, is considered as lower, and it's coupling tag - as upper. Lower tag is moved first.
Consider the example:
<p>
<div>
Data 2
<span>
<em>
{{# foo }}
Data 1
</em>
</span>
</div>
</p>
{{/ foo }}
Here opening tag should be moved outside root p
element to reach one level with closing tag. It can not be moved towards end of document, because there is Data 1
text after opening tag. So we move it towards beginning of document, out of em
node, and than out of span
node. Then on it's way up tag meets Data 2
text, that is not included inside tag. So opening tag can not be moved anymore, and result is:
<p>
<div>
Data 2
{{# foo }}
<span>
<em>
Data 1
</em>
</span>
</div>
</p>
{{/ foo }}
Now we look at the upper tag. As there is no data between it and the end of p
tag, we can move it inside node, and position after div
element. In the same way we can move tag inside div
element, so the result is:
<p>
<div>
Data 2
{{# foo }}
<span>
<em>
Data 1
</em>
</span>
{{/ foo }}
</div>
</p>
As we reached the same level with opening tag, we have no need to move closing tag further along node chain. Tags are positioned correctly now.
Consider the example:
<p>
<span>
Data 1
{{# foo }}
</span>
<span>
<em>
Data 2
{{/ foo }}
</em>
</span>
</p>
Here we should move both tags to their common ancestor node, that is p
. We always begin with opening tag. We can not move it towards Data 1
text, so we move it towards document end, out of span
element. Result is:
<p>
<span>
Data 1
</span>
{{# foo }}
<span>
<em>
Data 2
{{/ foo }}
</em>
</span>
</p>
Now we move closing tag. It can not be moved towards Data 2
text, so we move it towards document end, out of em
element, and then out of span
element. Result is:
<p>
<span>
Data 1
</span>
{{# foo }}
<span>
<em>
Data 2
</em>
</span>
{{/ foo }}
</p>
Tags reached common parent element, so now they are positioned correctly.
Lets say that on previous step we failed to move tags to common parent. That can happen, if moving tag meets some data on its way, and stops before reaching common parent. In this case we do extend: create new pairs of tags, surrounding data on each nodes level, between given opening and closing tags.
Consider the following example.
<p>
{{# foo }}
<span>Data</span>
<span>Data</span>
<div>
<span>Data</span>
<span>Data</span>
<div>
<span>Data</span>
{{/ foo }}
Data
</div>
</div>
</p>
In here we can not move closing tag up, because is has sibling elements on both sides. We also can not move opening tag down. So we extend each tag, so that data on each level was correctly enclosed in tags. We always start from lower tag, and move towards upper tag, in this case from closing tag to opening. Result is:
<p>
{{# foo }}
<span>Data</span>
<span>Data</span>
{{/ foo }}
<div>
{{# foo }}
<span>Data</span>
<span>Data</span>
{{/ foo }}
<div>
{{# foo }}
<span>Data</span>
{{/ foo }}
Data
</div>
</div>
</p>
Consider the example:
<p>
<div>
<span>Data</span>
{{# foo }}
<span>Data</span>
<span>Data</span>
</div>
<div>
<span>Data</span>
<span>Data</span>
<div>
<span>Data</span>
{{/ foo }}
Data
</div>
</div>
</p>
Here both tags can not be moved. So we extend them to their common ancestor element. First the upper tag is extended. Result is:
<p>
<div>
<span>Data</span>
{{# foo }}
<span>Data</span>
<span>Data</span>
{{/ foo }}
</div>
{{# foo }}
<div>
<span>Data</span>
<span>Data</span>
<div>
<span>Data</span>
{{/ foo }}
Data
</div>
</div>
</p>
Then the lower is extended. Result is:
<p>
<div>
<span>Data</span>
{{# foo }}
<span>Data</span>
<span>Data</span>
{{/ foo }}
</div>
{{# foo }}
{{/ foo }}
<div>
{{# foo }}
<span>Data</span>
<span>Data</span>
{{/ foo }}
<div>
{{# foo }}
<span>Data</span>
{{/ foo }}
Data
</div>
</div>
</p>
If we obtain an empty tag pair in common ancestor node, we remove it. So the final result is:
<p>
<div>
<span>Data</span>
{{# foo }}
<span>Data</span>
<span>Data</span>
{{/ foo }}
</div>
<div>
{{# foo }}
<span>Data</span>
<span>Data</span>
{{/ foo }}
<div>
{{# foo }}
<span>Data</span>
{{/ foo }}
Data
</div>
</div>
</p>
After previous steps all tags are fixed, so no DOM nodes will partially disappear if some sections get hidden. But we can still do some improvement for tags:
- merge same sibling tag sections
- rise section from the containing node, if section contains all node's content
If same tag section repeats more than one time, and there is no data between these sections, we can merge them into single section. This improves readability of document and it's processing speed. Consider the example:
<div>
{{#tag}}<span>Data</span>{{/tag}}
{{#tag}}<span>Data</span>{{/tag}}
</div>
After merging it becomes:
<div>
{{#tag}}
<span>Data</span>
<span>Data</span>
{{/tag}}
</div>
If section from previous example gets hidden, we'll end up with empty div
node. It's of no use, so it would be better if it was hidden together with section. So we should include it inside section, and result of this operation is:
{{#tag}}
<div>
<span>Data</span>
<span>Data</span>
</div>
{{/tag}}
Above steps might lead to the tags appearing in tables outside table cells, and that will break visual table structure. So we move such tags inside table cells.
<table>
<tr>
<td>Data</td>
{{# foo }}
<td>Data</td>
<td>Data</td>
{{/ foo }}
</tr>
{{# foo }}
<tr>
<td>Data</td>
<td>Data</td>
<td>Data</td>
</tr>
{{/ foo }}
</table>
becomes
<table>
<tr>
<td>Data</td>
<td>{{# foo }}Data{{/ foo }}</td>
<td>{{# foo }}Data{{/ foo }}</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td>{{# foo }}Data{{/ foo }}</td>
<td>{{# foo }}Data{{/ foo }}</td>
<td>{{# foo }}Data{{/ foo }}</td>
</tr>
</table>
That's it. Now we have good user-friendly template:)
Currently the following sections structures are supported:
- positive and negative sections:
{{# foo }}{{/ foo}}
and{{^ foo}}{{/ foo}}
- shorthand closing tags:
{{# foo }}{{/}}
The following sections structures are not supported:
- if/elseif/else
- using
with
- array element sections:
{{# foo:i }}{{/ foo }}