You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I saw an interesting trick for PSOS in the very short (3 pages) note
Henon, M., ‘On the Numerical Computation of Poincaré Maps’, Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 5.2–3 (1982), 412–14 https://doi.org/10/fm6qc9
The current code for PSOS, and it uses a root-finding algorithm to find the precise time needed to step the integration. In Henon's paper, he suggests transforming the ODE to solve for the precise time as a dependent variable, so the accuracy of solving for time would be the same accuracy as one step of the ODE solver.
I wonder if it's worth implementing in terms of increasing accuracy?
In general sounds good, my concern would be mostly about actually implementing this, and the performance defecit; I think the version we have right now is quite performant.
I saw an interesting trick for PSOS in the very short (3 pages) note
The current code for PSOS, and it uses a root-finding algorithm to find the precise time needed to step the integration. In Henon's paper, he suggests transforming the ODE to solve for the precise time as a dependent variable, so the accuracy of solving for time would be the same accuracy as one step of the ODE solver.
I wonder if it's worth implementing in terms of increasing accuracy?
Want to back this issue? Post a bounty on it! We accept bounties via Bountysource.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: