You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi. If this is not the right place to ask questions I apologize, thanks for pointing me into the right direction as the docs did not point out a platform to do so. Question: is it possible to indicate what the relation is between the ngx-mask version and angular wrt compatibility? From the releases it´s clear that there is an ngx-mask version that corresponds with a particular angular version. Is this a hard dependency or is this more like specific features will be unavailable if the versions do no match? Is there somewhere a compatibility matrix?
I´m asking this in particular for ngx-mask v13 icw angular v16: there were several changes between ngx-mask v13-v16 that will take some time to refactor/update, but it seems that ngx-mask v13 is still working fine with angular v16 (or at least as far as we could see). So is this a valid option to combine them or is that a problem waiting to happen? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi. If this is not the right place to ask questions I apologize, thanks for pointing me into the right direction as the docs did not point out a platform to do so. Question: is it possible to indicate what the relation is between the ngx-mask version and angular wrt compatibility? From the releases it´s clear that there is an ngx-mask version that corresponds with a particular angular version. Is this a hard dependency or is this more like specific features will be unavailable if the versions do no match? Is there somewhere a compatibility matrix?
I´m asking this in particular for ngx-mask v13 icw angular v16: there were several changes between ngx-mask v13-v16 that will take some time to refactor/update, but it seems that ngx-mask v13 is still working fine with angular v16 (or at least as far as we could see). So is this a valid option to combine them or is that a problem waiting to happen? Thanks!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: