You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
We currently do a bit of a hack to seed the RNGs when running in parallel (a random seed is chosen and other processors are seeded using an offset), which probably isn't the most robust thing to do.
We currently do a bit of a hack to seed the RNGs when running in parallel (a random seed is chosen and other processors are seeded using an offset), which probably isn't the most robust thing to do.
numpy now has better support for this type of scenario: https://numpy.org/doc/stable/reference/random/parallel.html (xref https://scicomp.stackexchange.com/questions/23547/parallel-mersenne-twister-for-monte-carlo) and we should probably do that instead with some support for backwards reproducibility (which would not be the default but could still work).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: