Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Optional reset_value input in reg blocks #333

Open
Jacajack opened this issue Nov 21, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

Optional reset_value input in reg blocks #333

Jacajack opened this issue Nov 21, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
@Jacajack @WojciechPtas
Labels
analyzer Related to semantic & design analyzers codegen Related to codegen implementation elaboration HIRN elaboration phase enhancement New feature or request hirn HIRN related next gen To be delivered in the next generation

Comments

@Jacajack
Copy link
Owner

Feature description

Registers should have an optional input called reset_value specifying register value after reset. If not present in the binding list, it should be assumed to be 0.
@Jacajack Jacajack added enhancement New feature or request codegen Related to codegen implementation analyzer Related to semantic & design analyzers hirn HIRN related nice to have Only if we have time elaboration HIRN elaboration phase labels Nov 21, 2023
@Jacajack Jacajack changed the title Register optional reset_value input Optional reset_value input in reg blocks Nov 21, 2023
@Jacajack Jacajack added next gen To be delivered in the next generation and removed nice to have Only if we have time labels Dec 4, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@Jacajack Jacajack

@WojciechPtas WojciechPtas

Labels
analyzer Related to semantic & design analyzers codegen Related to codegen implementation elaboration HIRN elaboration phase enhancement New feature or request hirn HIRN related next gen To be delivered in the next generation
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@Jacajack @WojciechPtas