Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Do pulsing on ticks that don't have blocks #4395

Open
lehins opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Do pulsing on ticks that don't have blocks #4395

lehins opened this issue Jun 11, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@lehins
Copy link
Collaborator

lehins commented Jun 11, 2024

This will require support from consensus.

TICK rule will need a new argument that says is there a block being processed on that tick or not

On the TICKs that don't have any blocks is the time when we need to do all pulsing and omit pulsing on the TICKs that do process blocks

This will improve propagation times, because block validation will not be affected by pulsers and will spread out pulsing computation much better.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant