You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have been doing research to see if methods exist for calculating the distance/collision between two signed distance fields. So far this is the only codebase I've found that looks promising.
I have spent some time trying to understand the codebase to see the performance of SDF->SDF collision and if that is really what is happening, but I am struggling.
And got some very small values. However the collision statistics in some of the examples say it spends around 16ms on collision detection per frame.
My question is:
Is the collision time just low because it has been culled by some other level of the BVH or is the SDF->SDF collision time actually just very low.
The reason is I was looking to replace the Flexible Collision Library (FCL) mesh->mesh collision with the SDF->SDF collision detection from here (if it is no worse than FCL). Bearing in mind that I am not using any BVH from FCL and just do a raw mesh->mesh collision checks.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I have been doing research to see if methods exist for calculating the distance/collision between two signed distance fields. So far this is the only codebase I've found that looks promising.
I have spent some time trying to understand the codebase to see the performance of SDF->SDF collision and if that is really what is happening, but I am struggling.
I put a timer around line 106:
https://github.com/InteractiveComputerGraphics/PositionBasedDynamics/blob/master/Simulation/DistanceFieldCollisionDetection.cpp#L106
And got some very small values. However the collision statistics in some of the examples say it spends around 16ms on collision detection per frame.
My question is:
Is the collision time just low because it has been culled by some other level of the BVH or is the SDF->SDF collision time actually just very low.
The reason is I was looking to replace the Flexible Collision Library (FCL) mesh->mesh collision with the SDF->SDF collision detection from here (if it is no worse than FCL). Bearing in mind that I am not using any BVH from FCL and just do a raw mesh->mesh collision checks.
Thanks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: