Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Team meeting 25/10/2020 #42

Closed
wassfila opened this issue Oct 25, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed

Team meeting 25/10/2020 #42

wassfila opened this issue Oct 25, 2020 · 1 comment

Comments

@wassfila
Copy link
Collaborator

wassfila commented Oct 25, 2020

Agenda :

@wassfila
Copy link
Collaborator Author

wassfila commented Oct 25, 2020

Fuel Gauge general discussion

  • generally voltage only, not very reliable as it does not map in percentage of remaining capacity
  • that's why a simple compare at one level Full/Empty would be enough
  • the LTC has a function to measure the internal resistance => aging of the battery details in the datasheet
  • requirement # 10 rejected at a time when LTC was not planned, then LTC functionality took over.
  • The advantage of a fuel gauge is to show a measure independent from the uC
  • if the uC gets involved then all options become easy, not even an LED compare would be needed, but still one LED compare can be kept to make it more reliable
  • two extremes simplest and best
    • simplest, it's not about simplicity, it's more about reliability
    • it's more important to have configurable options
    • most advanced fuel gauge, RGB Led (while charging only) / ePaper monitor (low power)

Andreas :
comment about information, what can you do with it ? Can you act with it ? so recommended to automate things, the system should take care and not the use, only warn me when there is a warning and not disturb if everything is working. Usually these PCBs are in a box or built into something, still one GPIO could be added if really needed. not recommended to have on board gauge, but could be added as add on for configurable project, just not on the core board

Charging Status LED

@MantaRayDeeJay express concerns about having it running parallel to the LTC chip, due to ground elevation / sense function.

=> TODO #44 simulation ongoing @2010019970909 with test of LED battery full status (local work could be put on a file on the repo)

  • not recommended to add LED in parallel to the power as it does not necessarily means loading.

image

Andreas :
it's a detail, provided general concept about information.

feature MCU PR

feature RTC rework

Next steps before routing

  • hierarchical labels to be added to MCU sheet
  • VBUS to be added as hierarchical label
  • lots of ERC errors to solve, help needed will be done once all is in master

Routing strategy

  • cannot be shared as would conflict so to be done one by one
  • no parallel branches
  • each work merge in master
  • next branch and continue
  • all components to be checked again BOM definition (which MOSFET, values,..)
  • improvements on using kicad global component

Announcements

Andreas:

  • important to work on announcement

  • if a board variant is available, would be good to challenge the work on the public channels

  • low cost version ready for reviews

  • TODO provide ready pdfs for reviews to provide to @Informaticore that will post the announcement

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant