Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pay scale #15

Open
jsms90 opened this issue Apr 15, 2017 · 3 comments
Open

pay scale #15

jsms90 opened this issue Apr 15, 2017 · 3 comments

Comments

@jsms90
Copy link
Contributor

jsms90 commented Apr 15, 2017

@sofer 's google doc

@bradreeder
Copy link
Contributor

@sofer

In relation to this, are Anna Freud looking for paid support for the next hackathon in May and is this something we should consider taking on?

@nogainbar
Copy link

nogainbar commented Apr 15, 2017

I would ❤️ that..

@jsms90 jsms90 changed the title supporting FAC graduate projects pay scale Apr 19, 2017
@jsms90
Copy link
Contributor Author

jsms90 commented Apr 20, 2017

Some questions were thrown around after our meeting with Sion on 19th April, where he spoke about Calverts paying it's members equally.

  1. This pay structure
  • How do we encourage equal commitment to the coop with the pay disparity / time required from the different roles?
  • Those in the "support" roles will either need to look for other work, or we will need to make sure that that person has other work from us at the same time. Can we do that?
    Are we in danger of losing that person / can we guarantee keeping that person on board?
  • Do we all need to rotate into these "support" roles, to keep the pay fair? Is that possible (me as UX/UI vs @nogainbar 😅 )
  1. We probably need to pitch a different model & therefore different pay structure depending on the project
    e.g. If the project requires a lot of research to help the client figure out what they want built, before we even start developing

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants