Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

I am confused because of other online articles introducing easy_hand. #132

Open
flashmoment opened this issue Jan 5, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Comments

@flashmoment
Copy link

The final result represents the transformation matrix from the robotic arm's base coordinate system to the camera coordinate system, correct?

@flashmoment
Copy link
Author

"I would like to ask, in the 'eye on base' mode, is the result obtained the transformation matrix from the base coordinate system (base) to the camera coordinate system (camera)?"

@marcoesposito1988
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @flashmoment,

yes, that's correct, although I don't remember the direction of the transformation off the top of my head. You can try inverting the matrix and checking if then it corresponds with what you expect.

You should also pay attention to the tf frames that are being used. In particular when using AR markers with RGBD cameras you may need to publish the result of the marker tracking with respect to the camera's optical frame, but then compute the calibration with respect to the root tf frame of the camera, as done here for the ROS1 version of easy_handeye

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants