You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Hi, thanks for your nice research.
I 'd like to collect a custom dataset similar to Kitti' s. While I have a doubt that, is it true the 2d bbox we use for training is the 2d projection of its corresponding 3d bbox? If yes, then usually the 2d bboxes cover more areas than the 2d objects do when the 3d bboxes closely surround the 3d objects. In another word, the 2d bboxes are not that close to the boundaries of the 2d objects. Do I make it clear? Thank you if you could help me with this question.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, thanks for your nice research. I 'd like to collect a custom dataset similar to Kitti' s. While I have a doubt that, is it true the 2d bbox we use for training is the 2d projection of its corresponding 3d bbox? If yes, then usually the 2d bboxes cover more areas than the 2d objects do when the 3d bboxes closely surround the 3d objects. In another word, the 2d bboxes are not that close to the boundaries of the 2d objects. Do I make it clear? Thank you if you could help me with this question.
Hi, thanks for your nice research.
I 'd like to collect a custom dataset similar to Kitti' s. While I have a doubt that, is it true the 2d bbox we use for training is the 2d projection of its corresponding 3d bbox? If yes, then usually the 2d bboxes cover more areas than the 2d objects do when the 3d bboxes closely surround the 3d objects. In another word, the 2d bboxes are not that close to the boundaries of the 2d objects. Do I make it clear? Thank you if you could help me with this question.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: