Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Create different implementations/generations of kwalify syntax #46

Open
Grokzen opened this issue Mar 22, 2016 · 0 comments
Open

Create different implementations/generations of kwalify syntax #46

Grokzen opened this issue Mar 22, 2016 · 0 comments
Milestone

Comments

@Grokzen
Copy link
Owner

Grokzen commented Mar 22, 2016

Currently there is some problems with that the syntax definition just grows as more and more features is added on top of the original kwalify syntax.

The long term suggestion is to make 2 different syntax schemas where one is a strict version that just implements the syntax that the original kwalify supported. Then there should be a newer and more modern version of the syntax that has all the backwards compatible kwalify syntax but also includes the new rules and syntax.

Suggested terms could be strict for the original kwalify and modern or standard for the second iteration.

The suggestion is to make the modern variant the default so that no changes will have to be imposed on people who currently uses all the new features. Then there will be added an option to use the strict version for people that requires it.

This is a long term plan and will probably make/bump the version to 2.0.0 when implemented.

@Grokzen Grokzen changed the title Create different versions of validation rules Create different implementations of kwalify syntax Mar 22, 2016
@Grokzen Grokzen modified the milestone: 2.0.0 Mar 22, 2016
@Grokzen Grokzen changed the title Create different implementations of kwalify syntax Create different implementations/generations of kwalify syntax Mar 22, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant