-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 50
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Possible chance to simplify the script and let Google do the heavy lifting (data merging) #102
Comments
I think I had looked into this while performing the major rewrite of
version 3, but it could have changed and/or I could be misremembering, so
feel free to correct me on this: I'll look into it accurately as soon as I
can.
I don't think the People API is integrated into Google Scripts: if we
wanted to use it we would need to implement OAuth which would make it
impossible for users to simply copy-paste and deploy.
|
Ah, OK. That sounds suspiciously like either a red herring, or a way-too-much-effort-for-too-little-return thingy. I'll leave it up to you when/if to close this then, based on how motivated you or anyone else feels. |
...actually, on this page when you look at |
I don't think our way has been deprecated, since we do not use the Google Contacts API directly, but the ContactsApp class (which I imagine uses the API behind the scenes). The documentation is not exactly clear regarding this topic, but this is what I think I have understood:
|
I noticed in the docs for the latest (3.0) API for Contacts at the top there is the following note:
which links to the People API, which seems to be a merged datasource for contact info and profile data from various sources (I'm guessing primarily Google+). I haven't dived deeply into it (I am not registered for anything other than Contacts, and am hesitant to start registering for other things just to test this API). It would be nice if someone who already has access to Google+ etc wants to test whether this API is relevant and adds any value, or is just a red-herring...
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: